Needless to say I'm interested in the recent hubub in the "skeptic" (atheist) community, in which a female blogger received widespread criticism (including from Richard Dawkins) for calling attention to the sexual harassment she experienced at a recent conference. The skeptic community (which is overwhelmingly male, I believe) seems to be reeling with questions like "then when is it appropriate to hit on women?" Many of these questions and conflicts seem to apply to the academic community at large.
It's not fair to just ignore sexuality; it's a part of human nature that I believe if we address more openly and set new norms for male/female relationships in our post-public/private-sphere society, it will lead to empowerment of all genders.
The final thing worth reconsidering is what you might think of "sexual harassment" as: Just because something's not physical doesn't make it not painfully uncomfortable, intimidating, and contributes to the overall context of fear that women often live their everyday lives in.
I wasn't aware of this one blogger's situation, but like you, I'm a bit pissed off by the response of people like Richard Dawkins. One of the reasons I decided to leave the program I was in is because I do feel like I'm being excluded at times because I'm female. Not by everyone, but enough to know that I need to find another path for myself.
ReplyDeleteI've found it very difficult to navigate situations where I'm being excluded because of my gender, or when I feel uncomfortable. I'm realizing more and more that academia is late to the game of gender equity, and this definitely permeates into graduate education.
ReplyDelete